People v. Lopez

47 A.D.3d 431, 854 N.Y.S.2d 644
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 510

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J), rendered February 24, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The record supports the court’s findings that the photo array and lineup were not unduly suggestive. In each instance, defendant and the other participants were reasonably similar in appearance, and any difference was not sufficient to create a substantial likelihood that defendant would be singled out for identification (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 47 A.D.3d 431, 854 N.Y.S.2d 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

47 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chipp
552 N.E.2d 608 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)