People v. Lopez

207 A.D.2d 1017, 617 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10294
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the jury verdict convicting defendant of petit larceny is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant observed the perpetrator committing a larceny and assisted him in completing it (see, People v Robin[1018]*1018son, 60 NY2d 982, 984). The jury could reasonably infer that, by reason of his conduct, defendant had the requisite intent to commit a larceny (see, People v Farmer, 156 AD2d 1003, 1004, lv denied 75 NY2d 868). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Petit Larceny.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 207 A.D.2d 1017, 617 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 1017 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fagan
12 A.D.3d 1080 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)