People v. Lopez
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the jury verdict convicting defendant of petit larceny is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant observed the perpetrator committing a larceny and assisted him in completing it (see, People v Robin[1018]*1018son, 60 NY2d 982, 984). The jury could reasonably infer that, by reason of his conduct, defendant had the requisite intent to commit a larceny (see, People v Farmer, 156 AD2d 1003, 1004, lv denied 75 NY2d 868). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Petit Larceny.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
207 A.D.2d 1017 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.