People v. Lopez

158 A.D.2d 718, 552 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2274
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

As the prosecution concedes, the sentencing court erred in adjudicating the defendant to be a second violent felony offender.

The predicate crime involved the defendant’s prior plea of guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

However, that crime constitutes a violent felony offense only when the defendant has been initially charged with criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and pleads guilty to the attempted crime as a lesser included offense (see, Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [d]; People v Morse, 62 NY2d 205, 226). The [719]*719defendant had been charged with the attempt to commit such crime rather than the completed offense. Therefore, the conviction did not constitute a violent felony offense.

The sentences must, therefore, be reversed and the matters remitted for resentencing on both indictments, at which time the People may file a second felony offender statement. Moflen, P. J., Kunzeman, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 158 A.D.2d 718, 552 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 718 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nyack
185 N.Y.S.3d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Seifert v. Keane
74 F. Supp. 2d 199 (E.D. New York, 1999)