People v. Lopez

158 A.D.2d 430, 552 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2120
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of a nighttime burglary of an unoccupied apartment. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief consisting of a three-page summary of the facts, followed by a four-line "Conclusion” in which she states that she has not discovered any nonfrivolous issues and requests that she be relieved. This is an inadequate presentation and does not justify the relief sought. (See, People v Carroll, 72 AD2d 710, 711.) Counsel has failed to present the thorough exploration of the case and discussion of possible issues which are required on such an application. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 158 A.D.2d 430, 552 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 430 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Daniels
197 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Cooper
187 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)