People v. Lopez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 64
California Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 2018·No. S099549M·Published

Opinion

Filed 8/15/18

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S099549 v. ) ) MICHAEL AUGUSTINE LOPEZ, ) ) Alameda County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. H28492A ____________________________________)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed June 28, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 339, is modified as follows: In the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 353, the following words are deleted: “that a competency ruling under Evidence Code section 701 was not sufficient and.” As modified, the sentence will now read: “We reject Lopez’s argument that the trial court was required to hold a hearing under Evidence Code section 702.” The modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, (Cal. 2018).

People v. Lopez (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
420 P.3d 878 (California Supreme Court, 2018)