People v. Lopez

59 Cal. 362
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1881
DocketNo. 10,633
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 59 Cal. 362 (People v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lopez, 59 Cal. 362 (Cal. 1881).

Opinion

McKinstry, J.:

The challenge to the panel was properly disallowed. (C. C. P., §§ 226, 227.)

' All the instructions given were given in the exact language requested by the defendant, who can not now object to any of them.

There was evidence tending to prove that other horses disappeared from the same neighborhood at the same time as the mare and colt, with the larceny of which defendant was charged, and tending to show that the others were found, with the mare and colt, in the possession of defendant. Defendant’s objection to such evidence was properly overruled. (People v. Robles, 34 Cal. 591.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Ross and McKee, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
58 P.2d 917 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
People v. Black
238 P. 374 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Territory of New Mexico v. Livingston
13 N.M. 318 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1906)
State v. Donavan
101 N.W. 122 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Dawson v. Schloss
29 P. 31 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Territory of Montana v. Burgess
8 Mont. 57 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
People v. Cunningham
6 P. 700 (California Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Cal. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lopez-cal-1881.