People v. Loomis
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 02443 (People v. Loomis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Loomis |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 02443 |
| Decided on May 3, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 3, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND KEANE, JJ.
294 KA 22-00853
v
JASON LOOMIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
TODD G. MONAHAN, LITTLE FALLS, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KRISTYNA S. MILLS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERTOWN (MORGAN R. MAYER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson County Court (Daniel R. King, A.J.), rendered July 29, 2020. The judgment convicted defendant upon a guilty plea of criminal sexual act in the second degree (two counts).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of two counts of criminal sexual act in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.45 [1]), defendant contends that the enhanced sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see People v Fox, 204 AD3d 1452, 1453-1454 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 940 [2022]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 562 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) or otherwise does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Tennant, 217 AD3d 1564, 1564 [4th Dept 2023]; People v Baker, 204 AD3d 1471, 1471 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1069 [2022]), we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
Entered: May 3, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 02443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-loomis-nyappdiv-2024.