People v. Longo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Longo

38 A.D.2d 675, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 675 (People v. Longo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Longo, 38 A.D.2d 675, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: The defendant’s motion for a change of venue of the place of trial of the indictment pending against him in Jefferson County is denied because there has not been a showing on the record before us that the defendant will be unable to receive a fair and impartial trial in Jefferson County to warrant a transfer of the trial to another county. The motions for an adjournment and assignment of counsel are also denied since the subject matter of these motions rests within the province of the trial court. We observe, however, that the trial court in exercising its discretion should grant defendant a reasonable time to prepare his defense on the 131 count indictment pending against him. (Order entered Nov. 30, 1971.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: The defendant’s motion for a change of venue of the place of trial of the indictment pending against him in Jefferson County is denied because there has not been a showing on the record before us that the defendant will be unable to receive a fair and impartial trial in Jefferson County to warrant a transfer of the trial to another county. The motions for an adjournment and assignment of counsel are also denied since the subject matter of these motions rests within the province of the trial court. We observe, however, that the trial court in exercising its discretion should grant defendant a reasonable time to prepare his defense on the 131 count indictment pending against him. (Order entered Nov. 30, 1971.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 675, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-longo-nyappdiv-1971.