People v. Longa
Opinion
T
1 EP 18 P1 1:47
2
3 URT 4
5
6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM
7 PEOPLE OF GUAM, 8
V. CRIMINAL CASE NO. CF 0023-14 9
10 JOSE WHITE LONGA, FRANCIS DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLIE MADEUS, MINORICHY 11 NISAR T. RUGANTE 12 Defendants.
13
14
15 This matter came before the Honorable Arthur R. Barcinas on the 8th day of September, 16 2014, for a pre-trial conference. Assistant Attorney General Brian D. Gallagher represented the 17
18 People of Gua m, Attorney John C. Terlaje represented the Defendant Jose White Longa,
19 Attorney Douglas B. Moylan represented the Defendant Francis Charlie Madeus, and Attorney 20 Mark S. Smith represented the Defendant Minorichy Nisar T. Rugante. The Court finds good 21 cause in the facts and representations made by the People of Guam that the results of the 22 Federal Bureau of Investigation's testing and analysis of DNA evidence are still pending, and 23
24 no objections being made by any of the Defendants, the Court GRANTS the People of Guam's
25 Motion to Continue.
Order CF 0023-14; People of Guam v. Longa, Madeus, and Rugante
The Court sets the following schedule. A sta tus hea r ing on the status of the DNA 1
2 evidence shall be held on November 14, 2014 at 9:30am . The pre-trial conference shall be held
3 on January 14, 2015 at 2:00 pm . Jury selection and trial shall commence on January 21, 2015
4 at 10:00 am .
5 6
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED this SEP 1 82014 9
10 HONORABLE ARTHUR R. BARCINAS 11 Judge, Superior Court of Guam
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 SERVICE VIA COURT'BOX I acknowledge theta copy of the 26 original hereto was placed in the court box of'
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Longa (People v. Longa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.