People v. Long

56 A.D.2d 685, 868 N.Y.S.2d 86
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Long. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 A.D.3d 132

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered June 27, 2005, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see Penal Law § 265.02 [former (4)]) must be vacated as that count of the indictment had been dismissed by another judge prior to trial and was later mistakenly considered by the Supreme Court (see People v Flores, 43 AD3d 955 [2007]; People v Romero, 309 AD2d 953 [2003]; People v Smiley, 303 AD2d 425 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Spolzino, J.E, Florio, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Long, 56 A.D.2d 685, 868 N.Y.S.2d 86 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

56 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flores
43 A.D.3d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Smiley
303 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Romero
309 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)