People v. Lombardo

2019 NY Slip Op 718
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 2019
Docket49 KA 17-01611
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 718 (People v. Lombardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lombardo, 2019 NY Slip Op 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Lombardo (2019 NY Slip Op 00718)
People v Lombardo
2019 NY Slip Op 00718
Decided on February 1, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

49 KA 17-01611

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JOSEPH D. LOMBARDO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH D. LOMBARDO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered November 28, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.75 [1] [a]). Contrary to defendant's contention in his main brief, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses defendant's challenge in his main and pro se supplemental briefs to the severity of his sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

Entered: February 1, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lombardo-nyappdiv-2019.