People v. Lombard

17 Cal. 316
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Cal. 316 (People v. Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lombard, 17 Cal. 316 (Cal. 1861).

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree. On the trial of the case, it was shown that the deceased had threatened to take the life of defendant, and that these threats were communicated to the latter previous to the killing. It did not appear that the threats were followed by any overt act, and under the circumstances, the mere apprehension of danger was insufficient to justify the homicide. The evidence offered in relation to the character of the deceased was properly excluded. Such evidence is admissible only where the immediate circumstances of the killing render it doubtful whether the act was justifiable or not. The other evidence offered was irrelevant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Yokum
302 P.2d 406 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
People v. Bennett
118 P. 710 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
People v. Stewart
28 Cal. 395 (California Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Cal. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lombard-cal-1861.