People v. Lolly
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46
This text of 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46 (People v. Lolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Lolly, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
Opinion
Price objected, and contended that the statute under which examinations of persons charged with crimes were taken, did not extend to the present case before the court, The court decided that the examination could not be read; and there not being sufficient testimony without it, the jury acquitted her. ^
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lolly-nyctcompl-1822.