People v. Lolly
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46
Opinion
Price objected, and contended that the statute under which examinations of persons charged with crimes were taken, did not extend to the present case before the court, The court decided that the examination could not be read; and there not being sufficient testimony without it, the jury acquitted her. ^
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Lolly, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 46 (People v. Lolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.