People v. Logue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Logue

115 A.D.2d 285, 495 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54549

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 285 (People v. Logue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Logue, 115 A.D.2d 285, 495 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that he did not effectively waive his right to a jury trial. Defendant properly executed a written waiver in compliance with CPL 320.10 (2), and the record demonstrates that the waiver was made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The court properly denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30. The record conclusively refutes defendant’s contention that he entered a guilty plea in Town Court in satisfaction of all the charges. Several of defendant’s other [286]*286contentions are raised for the first time in his briefs and, thus, are not preserved for appellate review. We have examined them, however, and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J.— burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that he did not effectively waive his right to a jury trial. Defendant properly executed a written waiver in compliance with CPL 320.10 (2), and the record demonstrates that the waiver was made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The court properly denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30. The record conclusively refutes defendant’s contention that he entered a guilty plea in Town Court in satisfaction of all the charges. Several of defendant’s other [286]*286contentions are raised for the first time in his briefs and, thus, are not preserved for appellate review. We have examined them, however, and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J.— burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 285, 495 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-logue-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack