People v. Logan

295 A.D.2d 541, 744 N.Y.S.2d 682, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Logan. Read the opinion of the Court — 271 A.D.2d 549

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Feldman, J.), rendered June 17, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The trial court properly exercised its discretion in making its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269; People v Rahman, 46 NY2d 882).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Altman, Smith and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Logan, 295 A.D.2d 541, 744 N.Y.S.2d 682, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

295 A.D.2d 541 (People v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Rahman
387 N.E.2d 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)