People v. Lofton

192 N.W.2d 13, 34 Mich. App. 698
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1971·No. Docket No. 9005·Published

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant, Bonald Lofton, was convicted by a jury of entering a motor vehicle with intent to commit a larceny therefrom, MCLA § 750.356a (Stat Ann 1954 Bev § 28.588[1]). He appeals as of right.

Evidence adduced at trial showed that defendant was seen by several witnesses taking two cartons from a delivery truck. The driver of that truck confronted defendant, and defendant denied taking the boxes. The police were called and defendant was arrested. The defense was loss of memory induced by long-term alcoholism. Testimony at trial disclosed that defendant smelled of alcohol at the time of his arrest, but that he was not intoxicated.

[699]*699A review of the instructions given to the jury discloses no prejudicial error. Further, the record clearly demonstrates that ample evidence was introduced to support a conviction of the crime charged.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lofton, 192 N.W.2d 13, 34 Mich. App. 698 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

192 N.W.2d 13 (People v. Lofton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 750.356a
Michigan § 750.356a