Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Loftly

People v. Loftly

171 A.D.2d 1083, 579 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6941
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.D.2d 1083 (People v. Loftly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Loftly, 171 A.D.2d 1083, 579 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: In spite of our numerous admonitions to defense counsel in criminal [1084]*1084cases that failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) by providing defendants with notice in writing of their right of appeal constitutes "improper conduct” of counsel (CPL 460.30), some counsel continue to disregard the rules. Again, we remind defense counsel of their duty to comply with section 1022.11 (a). Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Simmons
171 A.D.2d 1084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D.2d 1083, 579 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-loftly-nyappdiv-1991.