People v. Lock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lock

138 A.D.2d 527, 526 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2860

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1988·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered April 11, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered April 11, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

People v. Lock, 138 A.D.2d 527, 526 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

138 A.D.2d 527 (People v. Lock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related