People v. Locascio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Locascio

101 A.D.2d 843, 475 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Locascio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Locascio, 101 A.D.2d 843, 475 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), imposed May 24,1983, upon her conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, on her plea of guilty, the sentence being five years’ probation with a term of six months’ imprisonment running concurrently with the term of probation as a condition thereof. 11 Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of six months’ imprisonment imposed as a concurrent condition of defendant’s probation to a term of four months’ intermittent imprisonment to be served on consecutive weekends from 8 a.m. Saturday until 5 p.m. Sunday. As so modified, sentence affirmed and matter remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to specify the first and last dates upon which defendant is to be incarcerated under such sentence in accordance with section 85.00 (subd 4, par [a], cl [iv]), of the Penal Law and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). H The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), imposed May 24,1983, upon her conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, on her plea of guilty, the sentence being five years’ probation with a term of six months’ imprisonment running concurrently with the term of probation as a condition thereof. 11 Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of six months’ imprisonment imposed as a concurrent condition of defendant’s probation to a term of four months’ intermittent imprisonment to be served on consecutive weekends from 8 a.m. Saturday until 5 p.m. Sunday. As so modified, sentence affirmed and matter remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to specify the first and last dates upon which defendant is to be incarcerated under such sentence in accordance with section 85.00 (subd 4, par [a], cl [iv]), of the Penal Law and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). H The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 843, 475 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-locascio-nyappdiv-1984.