People v. Lluveres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lluveres

303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 601, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2388

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 212 (People v. Lluveres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lluveres, 303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 601, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered May 29, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Questions of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury, and there is no basis for disturbing its findings. The jury could have reasonably concluded that the inconsistencies in the undercover officer’s testimony were satisfactorily explained. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered May 29, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Questions of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury, and there is no basis for disturbing its findings. The jury could have reasonably concluded that the inconsistencies in the undercover officer’s testimony were satisfactorily explained. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 601, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lluveres-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack