People v. Lloyd

241 A.D.2d 528, 663 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7788
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lloyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 163

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered July 7, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Pinder, 199 AD2d 544; People v Coico, 176 AD2d 339). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 . [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lloyd, 241 A.D.2d 528, 663 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 528 (People v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Coico
176 A.D.2d 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Pinder
199 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)