People v. Lloyd
This text of 371 N.E.2d 790 (People v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed. On the record here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s application, made at the commencement of the trial, for disclosure of the identities of the two informers (People v Pena, 37 NY2d 642; see, also, People v Lee, 39 NY2d 388; People v Colon, 39 NY2d 872; People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert den 419 US 1012).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 N.E.2d 790, 43 N.Y.2d 686, 401 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lloyd-ny-1977.