People v. Llama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Llama

19 A.D.3d 170, 795 N.Y.S.2d 887

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 170 (People v. Llama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Llama, 19 A.D.3d 170, 795 N.Y.S.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 25, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously dismissed.

Since defendant has been deported, he is not presently avail- able to obey the mandate of the court in the event of affirmance (see People v Bacon, 46 NY2d 1073 [1979]; People v Del Rio, 14 NY2d 165 [1964], cert denied 379 US 939 [1964]). Accordingly, his appeals are dismissed. Were we not dismissing the appeals, we would find no basis for reducing the sentences. Concur- Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Sullivan, JJ. 13

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 25, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously dismissed.

Since defendant has been deported, he is not presently avail- able to obey the mandate of the court in the event of affirmance (see People v Bacon, 46 NY2d 1073 [1979]; People v Del Rio, 14 NY2d 165 [1964], cert denied 379 US 939 [1964]). Accordingly, his appeals are dismissed. Were we not dismissing the appeals, we would find no basis for reducing the sentences. Concur- Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Sullivan, JJ. 13

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 170, 795 N.Y.S.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-llama-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack