People v. Liu (Zenglin)

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Liu (Zenglin)

186 N.Y.S.3d 499, 78 Misc. 3d 130

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2023

Docket2021-92 Q CR

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 N.Y.S.3d 499 (People v. Liu (Zenglin)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Liu (Zenglin), 186 N.Y.S.3d 499, 78 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

People v Liu (2023 NY Slip Op 50302(U)) [*1]

People v Liu (Zenglin)

2023 NY Slip Op 50302(U) [78 Misc 3d 130(A)]

Decided on March 31, 2023

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 31, 2023

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : CHEREÉ A. BUGGS, J.P., LISA S. OTTLEY, LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ
2021-92 Q CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Zenglin Liu, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant.

Queens County District Attorney (Johnnette Traill and Mariana Zelig of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Toni M. Cimino, J.), rendered March 11, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of harassment in the second degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

BUGGS, J.P., OTTLEY and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 31, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v Liu (2023 NY Slip Op 50302(U)) [*1]

People v Liu (Zenglin)

2023 NY Slip Op 50302(U) [78 Misc 3d 130(A)]

Decided on March 31, 2023

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 31, 2023

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : CHEREÉ A. BUGGS, J.P., LISA S. OTTLEY, LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ
2021-92 Q CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Zenglin Liu, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant.

Queens County District Attorney (Johnnette Traill and Mariana Zelig of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Toni M. Cimino, J.), rendered March 11, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of harassment in the second degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

BUGGS, J.P., OTTLEY and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 31, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.Y.S.3d 499, 78 Misc. 3d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-liu-zenglin-nyappterm-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack