People v. Little

110 A.D.3d 422, 971 N.Y.S.2d 871

This text of 110 A.D.3d 422 (People v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Little, 110 A.D.3d 422, 971 N.Y.S.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered August 12, 2011, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 16 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We find that a five-year term of postrelease supervision is not excessive, and that there is no basis for reducing it in the interest of justice. Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to reach any other issues. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.3d 422, 971 N.Y.S.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-little-nyappdiv-2013.