People v. Lipshetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lipshetz

285 A.D. 1165, 141 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7022

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 1165 (People v. Lipshetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lipshetz, 285 A.D. 1165, 141 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of the crime of petit larceny, and from the sentence imposed. Defendant also appeals from an order of said court denying his application for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty and to interpose a plea of not guilty, to dismiss the indictment for grand larceny for failing to state facts sufficient to constitute a crime, and for an order in arrest of judgment. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence and from the order, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of the crime of petit larceny, and from the sentence imposed. Defendant also appeals from an order of said court denying his application for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty and to interpose a plea of not guilty, to dismiss the indictment for grand larceny for failing to state facts sufficient to constitute a crime, and for an order in arrest of judgment. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence and from the order, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 1165, 141 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lipshetz-nyappdiv-1955.