Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Lipscombe

People v. Lipscombe

49 A.D.3d 781, 854 N.Y.2d 452
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 781 (People v. Lipscombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lipscombe, 49 A.D.3d 781, 854 N.Y.2d 452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[782]*782At the plea proceeding, the defendant was not advised that he would be subject to a period of post-release supervision as part of an enhanced sentence if he failed to comply with the conditions of his plea. After the defendant failed to appear on the scheduled sentencing date, the Supreme Court imposed the maximum sentence plus three years’ post-release supervision. As the People correctly concede, the failure to advise the defendant of post-release supervision at the time of his plea requires reversal of his conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Pagan, 43 AD3d 1086 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Curry
65 A.D.3d 1373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Gibbs
61 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Borrego
59 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 781, 854 N.Y.2d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lipscombe-nyappdiv-2008.