People v. Lipscomb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lipscomb

29 A.D.2d 960, 290 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Lipscomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lipscomb, 29 A.D.2d 960, 290 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 20, 1965, affirmed. In our opinion, the “ totality of circumstances ” surrounding the confrontation requires a conclusion that the identification, the connection of defendant with the crime, and his conviction did not result in depriving him of due process of law (cf. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293; People v. Ali, 29 A D 2d 779). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 20, 1965, affirmed. In our opinion, the “ totality of circumstances ” surrounding the confrontation requires a conclusion that the identification, the connection of defendant with the crime, and his conviction did not result in depriving him of due process of law (cf. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293; People v. Ali, 29 A D 2d 779). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 960, 290 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lipscomb-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack