People v. Liner
519 N.E.2d 619, 70 N.Y.2d 945, 524 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 43
Opinion
On the court’s own motion, defendant’s appeal dismissed upon the ground that a Judge of this court could not entertain defense counsel’s CPL 460.20 application after an application had been made by defendant pro se to a Justice of the Appellate Division (People v Nelson, 55 NY2d 743; People v McCarthy, 250 NY 358). Motion for assignment of counsel dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Liner, 519 N.E.2d 619, 70 N.Y.2d 945, 524 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 43 (N.Y. 1988).
519 N.E.2d 619 (People v. Liner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ramos
105 A.D.3d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sheridan v. Comp-U-Motive, Inc.
522 N.E.2d 800 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1988)