People v. Lindsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lindsey

236 A.D.2d 559, 654 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Lindsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lindsey, 236 A.D.2d 559, 654 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered January 30, 1996, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [560]*560could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered January 30, 1996, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [560]*560could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 559, 654 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lindsey-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack