People v. Linares

286 A.D.2d 629, 730 N.Y.S.2d 107, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Linares. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D.2d 504

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered October 6, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of six years, unanimously affirmed.

[630]*630The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s larcenous intent could be readily inferred from the circumstances, including defendant’s behavior when confronted by the complainant (see, People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 278). Furthermore, defendant’s argument that the assault conviction was tainted by the burglary conviction is without merit; the evidence supporting this criminal act is both separate and overwhelming.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Linares, 286 A.D.2d 629, 730 N.Y.S.2d 107, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Linares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Castillo
391 N.E.2d 997 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)