People v. Lilly
This text of 209 A.D.2d 975 (People v. Lilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant made an insufficient factual showing to warrant disclosure of all "use of force” reports prepared by the arresting officer (see, Civil [976]*976Rights Law § 50-a [2]; see also, People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 550). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that the officer sustained "physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see, People v Godbold, 207 AD2d 1008; People v Mallard, 207 AD2d 1018; People v Soto, 184 AD2d 673, lv denied 80 NY2d 910). The jury verdict finding defendant guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) and resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 975, 619 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lilly-nyappdiv-1994.