People v. Lilly

209 A.D.2d 975, 619 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11981

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant made an insufficient factual showing to warrant disclosure of all "use of force” reports prepared by the arresting officer (see, Civil [976] Rights Law § 50-a [2]; see also, People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 550). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that the officer sustained "physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see, People v Godbold, 207 AD2d 1008; People v Mallard, 207 AD2d 1018; People v Soto, 184 AD2d 673, lv denied 80 NY2d 910). The jury verdict finding defendant guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) and resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lilly, 209 A.D.2d 975, 619 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 975 (People v. Lilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gissendanner
399 N.E.2d 924 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Soto
184 A.D.2d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Godbold
207 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Mallard
207 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)