People v. Lillis

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Lillis

307 N.E.2d 46, 33 N.Y.2d 829, 351 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 874

DecidedDecember 27, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 307 N.E.2d 46 (People v. Lillis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lillis, 307 N.E.2d 46, 33 N.Y.2d 829, 351 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 874 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Ful® and Judges Burke, Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Breitel dissents and votes to reverse and remit for a hearing in the following memorandum: In view of counsel’s statement to the court at the time of the taking of the plea that defendant had been hallucinating within the last month, the court was not entitled to rely on its own layman interrogation of the defendant and accept the plausibility of defendant’s responses. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Ful® and Judges Burke, Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Breitel dissents and votes to reverse and remit for a hearing in the following memorandum: In view of counsel’s statement to the court at the time of the taking of the plea that defendant had been hallucinating within the last month, the court was not entitled to rely on its own layman interrogation of the defendant and accept the plausibility of defendant’s responses. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 N.E.2d 46, 33 N.Y.2d 829, 351 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lillis-ny-1973.