People v. Ligon

2021 NY Slip Op 05720, 198 A.D.3d 920, 152 N.Y.S.3d 841
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 2021
DocketInd. No. 18-00830
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05720 (People v. Ligon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ligon, 2021 NY Slip Op 05720, 198 A.D.3d 920, 152 N.Y.S.3d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Ligon (2021 NY Slip Op 05720)
People v Ligon
2021 NY Slip Op 05720
Decided on October 20, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 20, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2019-04610
(Ind. No. 18-00830)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Daniel R. Ligon, appellant.


Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Craig Stephen Brown, J.), imposed April 1, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because the County Court mischaracterized the nature of the right to appeal by misstating that the defendant waived the right to appeal any and all issues concerning his sentence and otherwise stated in an overbroad fashion that his sentence would be final and conclusive (see People v Whitlock, 189 AD3d 1473; People v Eduardo S., 186 AD3d 1265, 1267; People v Contreras, 183 AD3d 759; People v Howard, 183 AD3d 640). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim (see e.g. People v Fuller, 163 AD3d 715).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY, BARROS and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Howard
2020 NY Slip Op 2660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Contreras
2020 NY Slip Op 2805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Eduardo S.
2020 NY Slip Op 04873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Whitlock
2020 NY Slip Op 07924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 05720, 198 A.D.3d 920, 152 N.Y.S.3d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ligon-nyappdiv-2021.