People v. Lightbourne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lightbourne

34 A.D.2d 799, 311 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4932

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 799 (People v. Lightbourne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lightbourne, 34 A.D.2d 799, 311 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 8, 1966 as to defendant Lightbourne and December 16, 1966 as to defendant Sheppard, convicting them of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. In our opinion, the evidence was insufficient to warrant a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that the entry into the apartment was made with intent to commit a crime (cf. People v. Cleague, 22 N Y 2d 363, 366; People v. Taddio, 292 N. Y. 488, 489; People v. Orr, 270 N. Y. 193, 196; People v. Seaman, 21 A D 2d 907). If we were not dismissing the indictment, a new trial would be required because of improper references in the prosecutor’s summation to defendants’ failure to testify (cf. People v. Mirenda, 23 N Y 2d 439, 457; People v. Christman, 23 N Y 2d 429, 433; People v. Gould, 25 A D 2d 160, 162). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendants from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 8, 1966 as to defendant Lightbourne and December 16, 1966 as to defendant Sheppard, convicting them of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. In our opinion, the evidence was insufficient to warrant a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that the entry into the apartment was made with intent to commit a crime (cf. People v. Cleague, 22 N Y 2d 363, 366; People v. Taddio, 292 N. Y. 488, 489; People v. Orr, 270 N. Y. 193, 196; People v. Seaman, 21 A D 2d 907). If we were not dismissing the indictment, a new trial would be required because of improper references in the prosecutor’s summation to defendants’ failure to testify (cf. People v. Mirenda, 23 N Y 2d 439, 457; People v. Christman, 23 N Y 2d 429, 433; People v. Gould, 25 A D 2d 160, 162). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgments.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 799, 311 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lightbourne-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack