People v. Liggon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Liggon

156 A.D.2d 589, 550 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Liggon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Liggon, 156 A.D.2d 589, 550 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from (1) two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered April 15, 1988, each revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon (a) his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 857/86, and (b) his previous conviction of criminal possession of marihuana in the third degree under indictment No. 807/85 and (2) a judgment of the same court [590]*590rendered April 22, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance under indictment No. 1607/87, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgments and judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from (1) two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered April 15, 1988, each revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon (a) his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 857/86, and (b) his previous conviction of criminal possession of marihuana in the third degree under indictment No. 807/85 and (2) a judgment of the same court [590]*590rendered April 22, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance under indictment No. 1607/87, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgments and judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 589, 550 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-liggon-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack