People v. Lieter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lieter

79 A.D.2d 1034, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 1034 (People v. Lieter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lieter, 79 A.D.2d 1034, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 10,1980, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 4 years and a maximum of 12 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of six years. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J. P., Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur; Mangano, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 10,1980, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 4 years and a maximum of 12 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of six years. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J. P., Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur; Mangano, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 1034, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lieter-nyappdiv-1981.