People v. . Liberman Dairy Company
89 N.E. 1100, 195 N.Y. 609, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1231
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative ; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner and Hisoock, JJ.; Cullen, Cli. J., and Haight, J., dissent upon the ground that the fact that the prohibition of the sale of skim milk in New York and Kings counties is unqualified, while the legislature recognizes such milk as an article fit for sale in the other counties of the state, renders this provision of the statute invalid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. . Liberman Dairy Company, 89 N.E. 1100, 195 N.Y. 609, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1231 (N.Y. 1909).
89 N.E. 1100 (People v. . Liberman Dairy Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.