People v. Lian Qiu

121 A.D.3d 918, 993 N.Y.S.2d 518
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 2014·No. 2012-11086·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J., at plea; Melendez, J, at *919 sentence), all imposed October 9, 2012, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Contreras, 112 AD3d 649 [2013]; People v Torres, 109 AD3d 669 [2013]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, EJ., Balkin, Dickerson, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lian Qiu, 121 A.D.3d 918, 993 N.Y.S.2d 518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 918 (People v. Lian Qiu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sunderland
134 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Belton
131 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)