People v. Li Vecchi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Li Vecchi

21 A.D.2d 741, 250 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3748

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 741 (People v. Li Vecchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Li Vecchi, 21 A.D.2d 741, 250 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, the failure of the People to produce very important exhibits on this appeal seriously affected defendant’s right to review the judgment of conviction. An examination by this court of physical exhibits such as the two pieces of the nail file could have been determinative of this entire appeal one way or the other. There is also an absence of reports from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, not satisfactorily explained, as to exhibits that were sent to the bureau for inspection and analysis. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of burglary, third degree.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Yecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, the failure of the People to produce very important exhibits on this appeal seriously affected defendant’s right to review the judgment of conviction. An examination by this court of physical exhibits such as the two pieces of the nail file could have been determinative of this entire appeal one way or the other. There is also an absence of reports from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, not satisfactorily explained, as to exhibits that were sent to the bureau for inspection and analysis. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of burglary, third degree.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Yecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 741, 250 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-li-vecchi-nyappdiv-1964.