People v. Leybinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Leybinsky

299 A.D.2d 494, 749 N.Y.S.2d 884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.D.2d 494 (People v. Leybinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Leybinsky, 299 A.D.2d 494, 749 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered January 23, 2001, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court, rendered June 18, 1996, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. Failure to advise a defendant of possible deportation consequences prior to accepting a plea agreement is not ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). To the extent that the defendant claims on appeal that counsel affirmatively misstated the deportation consequences of his plea, such claim was not established by the [495]*495defendant’s motion papers. Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered January 23, 2001, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court, rendered June 18, 1996, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. Failure to advise a defendant of possible deportation consequences prior to accepting a plea agreement is not ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). To the extent that the defendant claims on appeal that counsel affirmatively misstated the deportation consequences of his plea, such claim was not established by the [495]*495defendant’s motion papers. Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 494, 749 N.Y.S.2d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-leybinsky-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack