People v. Lewis

41 A.D.3d 139, 835 N.Y.S.2d 899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 A.D.3d 824

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered on or about August 15, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea, and since this case does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]), his challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would conclude that defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and that there was nothing in the plea allocution that cast significant doubt on his guilt (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725 [1995]). Defendant pleaded guilty with full knowledge of the elements of the crime he was admitting.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lewis, 41 A.D.3d 139, 835 N.Y.S.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 139 (People v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Seeber
826 N.E.2d 797 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)