People v. Lewis

236 A.D.2d 880, 653 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 389

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By entering a plea of guilty before pretrial hearings were held on his suppression motion, defendant forfeited any right to appellate review of his challenge to the admissibility of the People’s evidence (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688). By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant waived his argument that the plea allocution was insufficient (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; cf., People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666). This is not one of those rare cases where defendant’s recitation of the facts casts significant doubt upon defendant’s guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea, thereby making preservation unnecessary (see, People v Lopez, supra, at 666). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lewis, 236 A.D.2d 880, 653 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 880 (People v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Fernandez
490 N.E.2d 838 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)