People v. Lewis

179 A.D.2d 778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

The defendant contends that the People did not establish his guilt of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, [779]*779we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lewis, 179 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 778 (People v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)