People v. Lewis
This text of 271 A.D.2d 1050 (People v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments of conviction and orders reversed on the law and a new trial granted, and motion for a bill of particulars granted. Memorandum: The trial court should have granted the request of the defendant’s counsel to charge more clearly and definitely as to what testimony in the ease, if any, constituted proof independent of the alleged confessions and as to the necessity of such independent proof. The court should have permitted a more extended cross-examination of the witness Donnelly as to the basis for the promises of immunity made to him. We cannot say from this record that the defendant was not prejudiced by these rulings of the trial court, and, therefore, the judgments of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. Preliminary to the new trial, the District Attorney should be required to inform the defendant as to the exact date of the commission of the alleged criminal acts, so that the defendant can prepare alibi proof, if he so desires. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (See Code Grim. Pro., § 542.) (The judgments convict defendant of the crime of sodomy; the orders deny defendant’s motion for a new trial and his motion for a bill of particulars.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lewis-nyappdiv-1947.