People v. Leung

57 A.D.3d 636, 868 N.Y.2d 533

This text of 57 A.D.3d 636 (People v. Leung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Leung, 57 A.D.3d 636, 868 N.Y.2d 533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[637]*637Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was clear and convincing proof to warrant the assessment of points against him for a history of substance abuse as set forth in the risk assessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the RAI). The Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender based upon the facts of the case and the RAI (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Smolen, 47 AD3d 623 [2008]; People v Yarborough, 43 AD3d 1129 [2007]; People v Grimmett, 29 AD3d 766 [2006]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Grimmett
29 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Yarborough
43 A.D.3d 1129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Smolen
47 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 636, 868 N.Y.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-leung-nyappdiv-2008.