People v. Leung
This text of 207 A.D.2d 416 (People v. Leung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered February 19, 1991, convicting him of rape in the first degree (2 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Kings County had jurisdiction to prosecute the defendant for the crime of rape since the element of forcible compulsion commenced in Kings County and continued uninterrupted into Queens County (see, People v Burgess, 107 AD2d 703).
The prosecution’s summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. The trial court sustained almost all of the defendant’s objections, and curative instructions were given. Under the circumstances, the court properly concluded that the defendant had not been prejudiced and a mistrial was not required.
The sentence imposed was appropriate under the circumstances of this case (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mengano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.D.2d 416, 616 N.Y.S.2d 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-leung-nyappdiv-1994.