People v. Letendre

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Letendre

731 N.E.2d 153, 94 N.Y.2d 939, 709 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 525

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 731 N.E.2d 153 (People v. Letendre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Letendre, 731 N.E.2d 153, 94 N.Y.2d 939, 709 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 525 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. De *941 fendant was convicted at a second trial of three counts of arson in the third degree (see, People v Letendre, 247 AD2d 796). The Appellate Division, on the second appeal before that court, affirmed the judgment of conviction (People v Letendre, 264 AD2d 943). The Justice dissenting from that decision then granted defendant leave to appeal.

The finding of probable cause made by the Appellate Division on the appeal now before us involves a mixed question of law and fact. Because there is support for the conclusion made by both lower courts, the probable cause issue is beyond this Court’s power to review in this case. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI