People v. Leon

207 A.D.2d 1016, 617 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Leon. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 A.D.2d 342

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. The evidence, the law and the circumstances of the case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, establish that defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147).

The sentence imposed is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Herkimer County Court, Kirk, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Leon, 207 A.D.2d 1016, 617 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 1016 (People v. Leon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)