People v. Lenear

255 A.D.2d 942, 680 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [a]). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that defendant intentionally aided his companion in the commission of the robbery (see, Penal Law § 20.00; People v Woods, 238 AD2d 900, lv denied 90 NY2d 912). We further reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence, is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lenear, 255 A.D.2d 942, 680 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 942 (People v. Lenear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Woods
238 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)