People v. Lenear

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lenear

255 A.D.2d 942, 680 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 942 (People v. Lenear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lenear, 255 A.D.2d 942, 680 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [a]). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that defendant intentionally aided his companion in the commission of the robbery (see, Penal Law § 20.00; People v Woods, 238 AD2d 900, lv denied 90 NY2d 912). We further reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence, is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [a]). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that defendant intentionally aided his companion in the commission of the robbery (see, Penal Law § 20.00; People v Woods, 238 AD2d 900, lv denied 90 NY2d 912). We further reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence, is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 942, 680 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lenear-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack